When Did “Plant-based” Become “Plants ONLY”?

When the New York State Assembly said so.  They recently passed A04072,, requiring all hospitals to – upon request – offer  “a plant-based food option as an alternative to every meal or  snack  offered  in  food service  to  the patient.”  In addition, all the hospital’s written material describing food offerings must now include the availability of a plant-based food option.

They take it a step further by defining “plant-based” as plants-only:

  • “Plant-based food option” means a food or beverage that is free of animal products and that has nutritional value comparable to the non-plant-based food option that it replaces.
  • “Animal product” means meat, poultry, seafood, dairy, eggs, honey, and any derivative thereof.

“Basically they are saying “plant-based” equals vegan,” said Toby Amidor, a NY-based registered dietitian nutritionist and best-selling cookbook author. “Those are two separate entities. [The State Assembly] is defining it as they wish.” 

Historically, “plant-based diet” has always meant plant  dominant, whereas vegan diets are exclusively from plants.  By the NY Assembly’s definition, even honey is excluded (bees are tiny but they’re animals).   

“Comparable Nutritional Value”? No Such Animal

Add a sprinkle of grated parmesan?
Oops! Then won’t be “plant-based”!


As for the bill’s requirement that the “plant-based” meals and snacks have a “nutritional value comparable to the non-plant-based food option that it replaces”, this is a huge ask.  “It might sound good on paper but it’s not truly possible,” according to registered dietitian nutritionist and certified diabetes educator Melissa Joy Dobbins.  “Offering plant-based options is one thing, but requiring them to be nutritionally comparable is problematic.” 

Nature just doesn’t work like that – there just isn’t always an ideal plant-based counterpart for an animal food, nor vice-versa.  Milk and yogurt are perfect examples.  There are plant-based alternatives, but none is nutritionally equivalent.  This is the whole premise of eating a varied diet.  The more food groups you exclude, the more nutritional risks you take. 

Dobbins added, “Implying that it’s a simple swap is misguided at best, and has the potential to contribute to nutritional deficits in an already compromised patient population.”  Hospital patients often have poor appetites, yet their protein needs can be higher than normal, due to the stress of surgery and illness.  Elderly patients at bedrest for an extended period lose muscle mass faster than younger counterparts, and may benefit from a diet that contains extra protein of the highest quality, such as in meat, dairy foods and eggs, and in less volume than a vegan diet would need to provide the same protein.

A “Solution” In Search of a Problem

What did hospitalized vegans do BEFORE this legislation?  “Accommodating vegan patients is standard,” according to Jessie Pavlinac, a chief clinical dietitian at the Oregon Health and Science University hospital in Portland and past president of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 

Pavlinac noted that hospitals would be cited by accreditation bodies for not having options for vegetarians and vegans.  

Cut-To-The-Chase Nutrition Advice

Dairy foods — and meat — can be in
YOUR plant-based diet, and for good reasons!

As consumers muddle through this “plant-based/plants-only” forest, there are a few facts – not hype – to remember about these terms:

  • “Plant-based” and “vegan” are NOT health claims.
  • Neither term indicates dietary quality.
  • These terms are simply descriptive, nothing more.

Defining plant-based to mean “excludes all animal foods” is incorrect and confusing.  Does the delicious salad pictured being “plant-based” if you sprinkle some parmesan over it?  Of course not, and no law should say otherwise — IMHO.

My guess is that the “nutrition-naïve” legislators were strongly influenced by lobbyists with a vegan agenda.  The bill still has significant hurdles in the Senate and the governor’s office before it could become law, but a similar bill was signed into law by California’s Governor Jerry Brown.  

Featured image courtesy of www.inkmedia.eu

Got a Salty Tongue? New Study Says It’s Not So Bad!

Hypertension and “low-sodium diet” seem to go together like two peas in an unsalted pod.  Salt, has been one of the “eat less of” ingredients that dietary guidelines and health organizations have warned us about forever.  We’ve been told of the risks to our blood pressure and heart health in particular.

In the US, we get about 3,500-4000 mg of sodium daily, according to the Centers for Disease Control   (women tend to be on the lower end of this range).  You may exceed these levels if you eat out a lot, as restaurant chefs are known for their generosity with salt.  US Dietary Guidelines recommend a max of 2,300 milligrams, and if you’re at risk for cardiovascular disease, it’s only 1,500 mg.  Even at 2,300 mg, it means cutting out a third of the sodium we eat.

Kimchi: Yes, it’s salty, but it’s OK,
just don’t binge!

The problem?  People HATE low-salt diets and they love salty food!   Even excluding French fries, these foods also figure into our love of salty savories:

  • Grandma’s chicken soup (and most canned or homemade soups)
  • Cured meat, fish (smoked salmon!) and cold cuts
  • Most condiments, from Worcestershire sauce to anchovy paste
  • Most ethnic dishes and restaurant meals
  • Almost everything savory that‘s canned or jarred (pasta sauces, tomato sauce, baked beans, and on)

S.O.S.: Save Our Sodium?

This study looked at just how bad the present intake of sodium is for our health and it turns out sodium may be a minor player. 

The study estimated sodium intake by assessing sodium in the urine (where 90% of our sodium ends up) and divided the groups into low, medium, and high excretion groups and followed them for about 8 years, looking at risk for cardiovascular events and death.

Interestingly, the groups at the most risk had both the highest and the LOWEST intakes of sodium, but only when they also had a low intake of potassium. 

The group with the LOWEST risk for death and cardiovascular events?  They had a moderate sodium diet (3.000-5,000 mg/day) but diets that were highest in potassium. 

D.A.S.H.-ing Through the Clutter

A diet that’s moderate in sodium but high in potassium.  That’s pretty much the DASH diet: “Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension”.  It works and it’s simple.  Just eating more fruits, vegetables, and low-fat and fat-free dairy foods (milk is an astoundingly good source of potassium) does the trick, and it’s what most people’s diets need more of anyway.  Here’s why I like the DASH approach:

  • It’s not regimented or prescriptive. It’s an eating style that works with all cuisines.
  • Plenty of delicious foods are also loaded with potassium. Eat your favorites and eat them daily. 
  • Bonus: eating more fruits, veggies and low-fat dairy foods will probably push out some of the higher-salt foods people eat now, especially for snacks.

ALL fruits and vegetables are good sources of potassium, but here are some superstars:

  • All melons and berries
  • All citrus fruits and juices (100% juice, please)
  • All potatoes, squash, pumpkin
  • All leafy greens (lettuce, spinach, kale, the whole lot)
  • Beets (don’t laugh – beets are the new “in” veggie for 2019!)
  • MILK!  Whole, 2%, 1% and fat-free, also yogurt are the top non-plant sources of potassium – and calcium.

Reality: It Doesn’t Have to Bite

High-potassium foods are a “must-have.” More important than “low-sodium”!

People in the free-living world aren’t going to stop eating their favorite savory foods and they shouldn’t have to.  It’s time we accepted that and focused on encouraging everyone to eat more high-potassium foods. This latest study suggests it may be more effective anyway.

While the research continues, make sure your favorite savories keep better company:

  • Ham sandwich?  Instead of the chips and soda, try an apple or banana and some iced tea.
  • Going out to dinner?  Start with a salad – dressing on the side so you stay in charge.  Have a nice baked potato – sour cream has no sodium! 
  • Soup’s on?  Add some beans and greens for good measure.
  • Bacon and eggs?  Lox and bagels?  Have a fruit and yogurt parfait along with it.  Or at least a glass of OJ or a banana.
  • Get the herbs and spices into everything: soups, salads, meat, fish, even yogurt!  Dried or fresh, herbs and spices are loaded with antioxidants and replace the need for some of the salt.

There’s no requirement for a specific fruit or veggie to be healthy.  Just eating more fruits, veggies and dairy foods is a start and a good one.  It’s a super-tasty way to get healthier all-around – and just by eating, because these foods also fill nutrient gaps.  The benefits go way past getting more potassium. 

Your Headphones Won’t Mask the “Noise” In New Egg-Heart Disease Study

For years, all you heard about eggs was that they were “linked with” heart disease.  Keep consumption to a few eggs per week and dietary cholesterol to less than 300 mg. per day. Since one egg has about 185 mg of cholesterol, you really had to be careful how you spent those 300 mg. 

Then, research found saturated fat to be riskier for heart disease than dietary cholesterol, but the egg damage was done.  Finally, the 2015 US Dietary Guideline for Americans finally dropped it’s 300 mg/day cholesterol limit.   

Eureka!  Progress!  Eggs Are Back!

Give up omelets? Say it ain’t so!

Just when consumers were getting comfortable having an omelet again, here comes a new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association that claims an “association” between egg consumption and heart disease.  At first glance, the study seems impressive:

  • They looked at 6 different populations or “cohorts”, covering a 17-year period, on average.
  • They calculated hazard ratios (HR) and absolute risk difference (ARD) for cardiovascular-related deaths and all-cause mortality.
  • They adjusted for “demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors.”

Here’s what they concluded

“Among US adults, higher consumption of dietary cholesterol or eggs was significantly associated with higher risk of incident CVD and all-cause mortality in a dose-response manner.”

They say that, for every 300 mg of cholesterol you eat, your chances of dying from heart disease in 17 years (assuming you’re over 50) are increased by about 17% and your chances of dying of anything at all are increased by about 18%.

But the average consumption of both eggs and dietary cholesterol was modest.  Even the cohort with the highest consumption of eggs ate only 0.42 eggs/day – less than 3 eggs per week!  Average dietary cholesterol intake was: 240 mg/day – well under the previously recommended 300 mg/day.

Turns out that, in this study, cholesterol become the issue, not eggs, but even when you just look at cholesterol, it’s important to hear the study’s “noise”.

The “Noise”, a.k.a. Weaknesses & Limitations 

It’s problems, plural, and the authors acknowledged some of them, but still felt entitled to make some strong conclusions (and I feel entitled to strongly disagree with them):

  • “Associations” and “linked-to” don’t CAUSE anything.  Anytime, and I mean ANYTIME you hear about a study that shows a food is “linked to” or “associated with” a disease or condition, it does NOT indicate the food CAUSES that condition, yet journalists often don’t get this concept.  These “Observational” studies are incapable of doing anything more than generating a hypothesis.
  • All the dietary data came from a SINGLE dietary report, and a self-report at that.  That’s like asking thousands of people about their diets on one day, and track how many die in 17 years.  Then draw conclusions about their deaths based on what they ate on that single day.  
  • Different dietary survey methods were used, so there was no uniformity of measurement.  To deal with that, the authors use a lot of statistical methods that “harmonize” the data and supposedly give you a better picture.  All methods still involved self-reports however.
  • Poorly surveying a large number of people doesn’t make data more reliable, no matter how you “harmonize” the data.  In this study, it still means 29,000 people were poorly surveyed.    
  • This study assumes a stable diet and lifestyle for 17 years, and that’s unrealistic.  No matter how many statistical tests you do, or how much “statistical significance” you find, no one – but no one – has that kind of stability for 17 years. 

Who knows what other lifestyle factors that evolved during the 17-years after the original dietary data were taken?  The authors do not, and the study cannot tell anything about what influence such factors might have had.

Yes, they’re STILL incredible…
….even for your heart!

Cut-To-The-Chase-Nutrition Reality Check

The egg has nourished people for thousands of years.  It has the highest quality protein of any food (it’s neck-and-neck with dairy), and critical, hard-to-get nutrients like vitamin D and choline.  Eggs also have the antioxidants lutein and zeaxanthin, known to help reduce the risk of age-related macular degeneration.  And they’re actually low in saturated fat. 

  • Pair your eggs with other good foods.  Scramble or fry them in olive oil, have them with fresh fruit and whole-grain toast.  It’s breakfast, but also lunch or dinner.
  • Balance it!  Greek yogurt with that fruit will round out the meal, or combine them in a smoothie as a beverage with those eggs.   
  • I keep hard-cooked eggs in my fridge as a high-protein snack.  Spread them with some Dijon mustard or hummus and keep hunger pangs away. 

The Easter bunny can rest easily.

Did Your Child Eat 90 Cups of Strawberries This Morning?

If that happened, then be concerned with pesticide residues.  Everyone else can forget about the Environmental Working Group’s annual “Dirty Dozen” list.  

I can always tell it’s spring — that’s when the EWG issues it’s list of fruits and veggies with pesticide residues, just when people are looking forward to spring and produce.  The EWG’s message is always the same:  Avoid the Dirty Dozen.  And the failures of their message are also the same:


AGAIN, the EWG fails to put pesticide use into context and AGAIN, that’s irresponsible. (Example: even a child would have to eat 181 servings (about 90 cups) of strawberries, the #1 food on Dirty Dozen list, to exceed safe levels. An adult male would need to eat 635 servings (about 317 cups) of strawberries. 

AGAIN, the EWG doesn’t mention the pesticides used in organic agriculture.  There are hundreds of them, and even a few dozen synthetic ones that are allowed under certain circumstances – while still allowing the food to carry an “organic” label.

AGAIN, consumers should be reminded that the feds have been looking at this for decades, through its Pesticide Data Program.

The “Villains”

Kale: The new addition to the “Dirty Dozen”
  1. Strawberries
  2. Spinach
  3. Kale
  4. Nectarines
  5. Apples
  6. Grapes
  7. Peaches
  8. Cherries
  9. Pears
  10. Tomatoes
  11. Celery
  12. Potatoes

It Really Is ALL Good

You’ve heard that “the dose makes the poison.”  It’s true, but the dose also brings the benefit.  Let’s remember: ALL the research proving the healthfulness of eating plenty of fruits and vegetables – fresh, canned, frozen, dried – throughout our lives, was done using CONVENTIONALLY grown produce, not organic. 

Organic is just another choice.  If buying organic gets you eating more fruits and vegetables, then terrific!  But if you can’t find them, can’t afford them, or simply want to eat healthful food that’s also more economical, then the conventionally-grown option is fine.  I eat organic produce sometimes, when it’s convenient and reasonably priced.  I also eat ALL the conventionally-grown produce on the “dirty” list. 

No, I Won’t Peel My Apples

Eat the peels! There’s good stuff there!

That may remove pesticide residues but it’s probably healthier to eat the edible peels and skins on produce – they’re loaded with antioxidants and prebiotic fiber.  The research supporting eating fiber outweighs the near-non-existent negative research on pesticides on our food.  It’s also a huge waste to throw away these edible portions.


My EdibleRx about LAST YEAR’s Dirty Dozen holds as true today as it did then, except that kale made this year’s list, bumping off sweet bell peppers. Yawn.  If you hate kale, you’re thrilled.  But if you like it, then it won’t kale you to keep eating it without concern.  

Still Have Doubts?

Get the facts.  This cool tool calculates how many servings of one of the Dirty Dozen a man, woman or child would have to eat before pesticides could become a concern.  It’s from the Alliance for Food and Farming – a non-profit organization of BOTH organic and conventional growers of fruits and vegetables on all sizes of farms.

Organic: The Answer To Cancer Prevention?

If anyone tells you they have the definitive answer, they’re misleading you.

Growing foods conventionally usually – but not always – involves the use of some pesticides when there’s a need to control harmful bugs, plant viruses, fungi, etc. that damage either the whole plant or the edible portion of it.  These compounds are expensive, so farmers tend not to use them unless absolutely necessary, and then in the least amount possible for the needed benefit. 

Organic crops are thought to be grown without pesticides, but there are hundreds of pesticides approved for use on organic crops.  Most are organic ones, but in certain circumstances, as with a particularly difficult to control pest, USDA has rules in place to allow limited use of a few dozen synthetic pesticides is allowed, and the food produced can still be labeled “organic”. 

But Is Organic Food Healthier?

Twice the price,
but twice the benefit?

“Healthier” has no formal definition, but let’s say it means you have a lower risk of developing cancer, since that’s a highly desirable outcome by everyone.  Would eating organic food make you less likely to develop cancer?

This recent study wanted to find out.  It was a prospective study – meaning that it went on for years before results were determined.  As part of a large study involving 68,946 French participants, all volunteers “self-reported” the frequency of consumption of organic foods.  Responses about consumption were multiple choice and ranged from 1 (“most of the time”) to 7 (“never”), with an option for “I don’t know”.  Demographic information was also gathered, including about household income.  This was interesting, because the top household income bracket was US $3,100, hardly “upper income” even in 2009, when the study launched.

The Good News: Organic Eaters Had Less Cancer

More frequently eating organic foods was “associated” with lower your cancer risk.   Key word, “associated”.  It’s the bane of my existence because it is often interpreted as “cause-and-effect,” a very wrong assumption. 

Why?  This study was “observational”.  These types of studies aren’t designed to evaluate cause-and-effect.  They can only generate a hypothesis that clinical studies could then evaluate for more direct conclusions.  This study is incapable of making such conclusions.

Photo: www.inkmedia.eu

The not-so-good news: the benefit of eating organic was minimal, at best.  The risk of getting cancer went down only 0.6% — that’s 6/10ths of one percent, and only for the most frequent eaters of organic food.  Even then, the benefit may be less than reported. Read on… 

Limitations of the Study, A.K.A. the “Fine Print”

The authors responsibly called out a fairly lengthy list of limitations of this study, and why the results need to be seen with caution:

  1. The participants were volunteers who were “likely particularly health conscious individuals”, therefore limiting the application of the results to the general public.
  2. The questionnaire used asked about frequency of consumption but not quantity.    Also, possible misclassification of organic foods, “cannot be excluded.”
  3. Follow-up time was short – an average of only about 4½ years.  Cancer can take many years to develop and it’s unclear what the diets of these participants were prior to participation.
  4. Possible “residual confounding resulting from unmeasured factors or inaccuracy in the assessment of some covariates cannot be totally excluded.”  This means there is a lot they didn’t measure or that they couldn’t measure accurately. 
  5. They could not exclude the non-detection of some cancers. 

Cut-To-The-Chase-Nutrition Takeaways

  • Will eating organic food help prevent cancer? Not based on this study.
  • Organic food is expensive, and thus out of reach of many, even if they can find it.
  • Organic doesn’t mean pesticide-free. 
  • Focus on this: A mountain of research showing the health benefits (including cancer risk reduction) of eating plenty of fruits, vegetables, beans and whole grains, was done using conventional foods! 

Got the Blues? Try Onions & Grapefruit!

OK, onions and grapefruit together isn’t appetizing, but eating more high-fiber foods like these, and maybe some butter, might help, according to new research.

You’ve heard for ages that diets high in fiber can reduce your risk for stroke, hearty disease, cancer, hypertension, and all sorts of chronic health problems.  In addition to all the above benefits, mounting evidence is telling us that a high fiber diet can improve brain health. 

This recent review looked at a wide body of research and concluded that compounds produced by healthy gut bacteria, especially a compound called butyric acid, may positively impact our brains.  Some of the research they reviewed involved only rats, but much of it looked at the impact of high-fiber diets on human behavior, and they found a reduction of anxiety and an improved ability to focus and multitask when there were more healthy bacteria present in the gut. 

An even more recent study that analyzed human gut bacteria found that people reporting a low quality of life and/or depression had different bacteria in their colon than people who had normal mental health and were happier.  The bacteria don’t impact our mental health directly, because they stay in the colon, but the compounds they produce do make it into the circulation and appear to positively impact our brain health.

Fiber: Why eat it if we can’t digest it? 

Fiber: you can’t digest it & you probably need more of it

When we eat, we’re not just feeding ourselves, we’re also feeding the bacteria in our colons, and high-fiber foods like oat and wheat bran, beans, and pretty much most fruits and veggies, promotes the growth of good bacteria.  That’s what makes high-fiber foods PRE-biotic. 

Undigested fiber sails past the small intestine, landing in our colon, where beneficial bacteria see fiber as an all-you-can-eat buffet.  When they’re through with it, they’ve produced beneficial by-products called short-chain fatty acids.  The three main ones are:

  • Acetic acid (think vinegar),
  • Propionic acid, and
  • Butyric acid (also called butyrate).

Butyric acid is getting attention because of its diverse biological functions in our bodies outside of the colon.  A lot of the benefits noted in the studies above have been attributed to butyrate, to the point that its potential health impact shouldn’t be ignored. 

3-4% of butter is butyric acid,
but better sources abound

You CAN Believe It’s Butter

High fiber foods aren’t the only way to increase the butyric acid in your colon.  There are some naturally-occurring sources of butyrate, such as probiotic foods like yogurt and kefir, that can increase strains of bacteria that produce butyrate. 

One of the largest single natural sources of butyrate is butter.  It’s true – butter contains about 4% butyric acid.  I’m not advocating eating more butter, and there are better ways to help get butyric acid into the gut.  Including fermented dairy foods, however, is definitely worthwhile for so many nutritional reasons.

The Fine Print

Ironically, people with irritable bowel and other gastrointestinal conditions are often advised to be on a “low-FODMAP” diet that eliminates many high-fiber foods that good bacteria use to produce butyric acid.  No worries – there are still lots of fruits and vegetables you can eat.  Stick to your prescribed diet and as your condition improves, just add FODMAP foods back into your diet as advised.  Kate Scarlata, RDN, is an outstanding registered dietitian who specializes in the FODMAP diet has tons of info on her website.   

Cut-to-the-Chase Conclusions

The point here is that the gut does communicate with the brain in very specific ways, and these may be influenced by the type and amounts of various strains of bacteria – both good ones and negative ones. Most people only get about 12-14 grams of fiber daily, and we should be eating twice that amount, according to US Dietary Guidelines.

Aim to gradually eat more fruits, vegetables, whole grain breads and cereals, and beans (these are loaded with great fiber!). As for fresh vs. frozen, vs. canned, no need to get too obsessive. Just eat more of these foods overall. Me? I never peel apples, carrots or potatoes. I’m not tossing away good fiber!

While nothing is a guarantee of good mental health, optimizing our gut environment is likely to also optimize our gut’s ability to send good messages to the brain.  It may not cure depression but even if it doesn’t change our perceived quality of life, it’s very likely to lay down a good foundation for the gut to operate at its full potential. A higher fiber diet is good for our gut — and good for the rest of our body as well. #winwin

I’ll take that.     

Dear Tom Brady: You Won, Your Nutrition “Beliefs” Don’t

Tom Brady is a multiple Super Bowl winner.  He’s also a businessman, and he’s glommed onto the formula for marketing a diet regimen:

  • Be a celebrity, preferably a sports celebrity, because they’re instantly believable.  Not credible, but no one cares about credibility or facts, just that you’re believable.
  • Look good, have a killer bod.  People will think your diet is the reason. Hey, sexy sells.
  • Have an equally hot spouse or significant other who can endorse you. And when you say you get to bed early every night, no one would doubt you. 
  • Talk about nutrition “beliefs” and “philosophy”.  Facts aren’t good for business.
  • Exclude all the standard food commodities. They’re not elite enough (see below).
  • Have all the trendy “free-froms”:
    • No gluten.
    • No red meat.
    • No dairy.  
    • No white potatoes or any other nightshade vegetables either, like peppers, eggplant, or tomatoes.  They’re “inflammatory”. 
    • No GMOs.
  • Keep it as green as possible.  Heavy on leafy foods, but he also includes beans – I do like this part.
  • Go against the grains – at least the common ones, like wheat and corn – again, those commodity foods the masses eat, because you aren’t most people.
  • Have expensive “uniquely formulated” products to sell – only available from your web site.  It’s critical to eat like a wealthy, elite athlete, not a commoner.
  • ELECTROLYTES!  The ones he sells in particular — the TB12 electrolytes.  They’re part of his “alkalinizing” the body, a must for health in his book.  (NO science supporting this – none).  A 20-serving, 1.7-ounce bottle sells for $15 (plus shipping).  That’s 71 cents per serving.  A serving of milk gives you three times more potassium, plus protein, sodium, calcium, and other nutrients you  need after a workout, for one-third the price. This from someone who chastises food companies about “brainwashing” consumers.  Shame on you, Tom. 
  • WHEY PROTEIN POWDER?!  This dairy food is OK – IF it’s TB’s specially formulated one.  It’s $50 for 21 servings, or $2.38 per serving.  To get the same amount of protein from real milk would set you back only about 65 cents, and you’d get all the other nutrients in milk to boot. 

Keep Edgy: Diss the Mediterranean Diet!

Sweet red pepper: One of many superfoods
NOT allowed on TB’s diet!

No cooking with olive oil!  Swap it for coconut oil.  No scientific basis for this – coconut oil is way more saturated than any animal fat.

No yogurt, eggplant, tomatoes, or peppers!  No cheese!  Nutrient-rich foods that have fed and sustained Italians and Greeks for thousands of years have no place in this winner’s diet.  Fish only if it’s wild-caught.  Farmed salmon, while quite healthy and affordable, but probably not exclusive, elite, or expensive enough.

You’re Busted, Tom. Ditching Dairy Is Dumb.

Dairy foods – from milk to yogurt to cheese – have unparalleled qualities.  If you know your nutrition, this isn’t debatable.  It might be boring, but facts often are. 

He writes, “When I was a kid, the dairy industry rolled out lots of campaigns urging people to drink lots of milk.  But research today is pretty clear that we should consume dairy in more limited amounts. Our belief [there’s that word again] at TB12 is that dairy products are high in calories and lower in nutritional value than other foods.”

I don’t know what “research” he’s talking about (I’d bet he doesn’t either), but there is no drink that can match a glass of milk for nutritional value and affordability.  None.  Furthermore, a mountain of solid science verifies the benefits of dairy foods, including that a glass of low-fat chocolate milk after a workout is BETTER than sports drinks for repairing muscle mass and improving endurance in subsequent workouts.   Why? Probably a great carb-to-protein ratio and a great electrolyte balance, plus vitamins and minerals.  Of course, milk is a commodity, so it has to be out. 

No GMOs?

Tom seems to disagree with over 100 Nobel prize winning scientists who have attested to the safety and nutritional value of foods produced with genetic engineering. I wonder what he knows?

Cut-To-The-Chase-Advice

Nutrition advice should be grounded in science and facts, not beliefs or philosophies.  Using the word “belief” shouldn’t give you a pass to propagate nutrition myths and misinformation. 

Most of us don’t have personal chefs to cook our meals (and clean up afterwards).  Tom’s diet may not be harmful to the average person, but the DASH and the Mediterranean diets have far more science behind them and are solid, affordable, and sustainable paths up the mountain towards good health.  They don’t require expensive “website” foods and supplements or forbid foods either – it’s a matter of how much and how often.  Not sexy, just solid.  For my health, I’ll go there.  Sorry, TB.

Food Fashions: Full-Frontal & Fickle!

It’s coming up on Fashion Week in New York and while that’s all about styles of clothes, foods come into – and go out of – fashion, too.  A previous post dealt with foods that nutritionists never thought would become popular, yet they did just that. 

Now think of the foods that were “in” — for a while.  I actually heard or read these comments recently:

  • “I’m so over kale, already.”  I read this comment by a former editor of a prominent food magazine. (Cauliflower is the new kale, if you’re wondering, but beets are gaining.)  
  • “Cottage cheese? What are you, like, 80?”  (This was said to me and no, I’m not 80 — but hey, nothing wrong with 80!)
  • “A baked potato?  A white one? Are you serious?”
  • “I don’t’ do bread.  All that gluten.  Quinoa is my thing.”
  • “She wants a Cosmo? No one drinks those anymore.”

All the above foods (excluding the Cosmo) are delicious and healthful.  They’re also “out of fashion” (including the Cosmo).  If this sounds a little ridiculous, read on.

Food Fashions Fade, Food Value Doesn’t

People may be “done” with kale, but is it less healthful than it was when it was “in”?  Of course not. It’s a superfood.  A baked potato is one of the best sources of potassium, even better than a banana, and has as much vitamin C as a tomato!  It always has!  Even so, all the buzz is that white potatoes are bad and sweet potatoes are a little better, but still a “starchy vegetable” to be eaten in minimal amounts. (Thanks, Harvard.)  

Fashion eating aside, the nutritional qualities of these foods have ALWAYS been there.  Whether it’s kale or cauliflower, or They’re as nutritious today as when they were first “discovered” by food fashionistas. 

Consider the following:

A healthful Russet Burbank white potato grown in Idaho!
  • Kale is every bit as good for you now as it was when you first tasted it.  It may even taste better now, since all that attention motivated chefs to develop inventive ways of eating kale.  Bravo.
  • White potatoes. Before you were told of their “horrors”, they were a staple food for millions of people from Paris to Poughkeepsie to Peru.  The nutrition they had is the nutrition they still have.  (Check out www.potatogoodness.com for a ridiculous number of facts and recipes. 
  • Bread?  It takes a hit for having “carbs” and gluten, which celebrities tell us are both bad (proof you should never get nutrition advice from celebrities).  Yet, it’s been a staple, indeed, the “staff of life” in many cultures throughout history.  Made with whole grains, it’s also loaded with fiber, vitamins and minerals.  It’s versatile, oh, and people like it. 
  • Cottage cheese?  PLEASE!  If you think it’s only for elderly ladies who lunch, experts disagree. registered dietitian nutritionist and exercise physiologist Jim White is one guy trying to set the facts straight about the value of cottage cheese. “If your goal is to increase lean muscle, mass try cottage cheese with a serving of your favorite fruit after a hard earned workout,” he says. He educates clients that a typical cup of low-fat cottage cheese boasts a walloping 27 grams of protein for those muscles, plus 200 mg of calcium to support bone health.

Sometimes fashionable eating can have benefits.  I love anything that gets people eating more veggies, yogurt, and whole grains of any kind.   But I get concerned that people strop eating these foods when the trend fades and the benefits also go missing from their diets, especially if they replace them with something less healthful.  (Example: plant-based “milks” are more hype than benefit.)

Cut-To-The-Chase Advice

Work it.  Let food fashions motivate you to try a new food.  If you like it, keep eating it!    If it’s nutritious and out of fashion, it’s still just as good for you as it was when everyone else was eating it to be “in.”  Never be intimidated about eating healthy food you like.

Wanna Eat Healthy? Get Your Nitrates!

Think nitrates in your food and eating healthy don’t go together? What’s this gorgeous spinach salad have to do with nitrates? Read on, but let’s start at the beginning.

You’re not going vegan but you want to eat better and you’ll start with baby steps, like I talked about in my previous post.  OK, and here are some popular intentions:

  • Try and eat more leafy green stuff.
  • Definitely cut the hot dogs, ham, bacon, the deli stuff, and “processed” meat, even if it’s lean.  Everyone knows that stuff is “bad” because it has nitrates, right?

Swapping out hot dogs and ham for spinach and beets (the new “in” veggie for 2019, as I mentioned here) would at least cut back on the nitrates, right?  Wrong. 

Where the Real Nitrates Are

Indeed, a bunch of healthy, nutrient-rich veggies like beets, spinach, celery, even iceberg lettuce and broccoli, have more nitrates than that hot dog you snuck in for lunch last week.  Check out this chart from a 2012 report of the nitrate content in foods.  Amounts are in “parts per million” (ppm):

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is mushrooms-417101_1280-2.jpg
More nitrates than a hot dog — & it’s healthy food!
  • Beets: 2797 ppm
  • Spinach: 2333 ppm
  • Celery: 1496
  • Mushrooms: 590 ppm
  • Broccoli: 394 ppm
  • Strawberries: 173 ppm
  • Cured sausage (hot dog), cooked: 32 ppm

Are Nitrates in Fruits and Veggies a Problem?

No, and not in other foods either, according to Melissa Joy Dobbins MS, RDN, CDE and known as The Guilt-Free® RD.   “This is a great example of how misinformation can create a “fear factor” when it comes to food. I think most people who are concerned about nitrates/nitrites would be surprised to learn that the majority of these nutrients in our diet are not from cured meats, but from plant foods, namely a variety of vegetables.”

Dobbins’ statement is evidence-based and reflects the conclusion of this 2015 meta-analysis of many studies on dietary nitrates, nitrites, and nitrosamines, which found nitrates associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer.  The slight increased risk associated with increased nitrite intake was considered weak, and tended to come from weak or poorly-designed studies, which muddied their findings.  Even then, spinach still has more nitrites than cured sausage.

Nitrates & Their Cousins: Nitrites and Nitrosamines

Here are the basics you need to know about these:

  • Nitrates are naturally present in lots of different foods. 
  • Nitrites are also naturally present in foods but most are formed when bacteria in your saliva convert nitrates to nitrites. 
  • Nitrosamines are not naturally present in food but can form in food through several pathways.  Cooking at a high temperature, such as frying cured meat, or when an acid (like stomach acid) is present.  If there’s any concern, it’s with the formation of nitrosamines.  Even then, conversion from nitrite to nitrosamine can be inhibited or stopped by the addition of compounds like ascorbic acid, or “vitamin C”.  Seriously – check the ingredient label of many cured foods like hot dogs and you’ll find “ascorbic acid” is often present. 

“Nitrate-Free” Cured Meat?

There are cured meats labeled “no added nitrates.”  What they add instead is celery powder.  As you’ll see from the table above, celery is loaded with natural nitrate.  There’s no evidence that there’s any difference between the nitrate in celery powder and the nitrate added to “nitrated” cured meat. 

Celery: Fine wherever you find it

Nitrates: The Boil-Down

It’s ironic to know that someone eating a spinach salad is probably getting 10 times more nitrates than the person eating the ham sandwich, but Dobbins noted, “Does that mean we should be afraid of eating vegetables? No. It means we should look at the overall nutrients a food provides and try to consume more nutrient-rich foods and fewer empty-calorie foods.”

It may be that the folks who eat lots of cured meat may also have a less-healthy lifestyle overall.  They may be less likely to engage in regular physical activity, and less likely to eat a lot of veggies and fruits, and may drink more soda or eat more junk snacks.

Cut-To-The-Chase-Advice

Eat all the spinach, beets, mushrooms, celery and broccoli you can fit into your diet.  As for cured meat, I like Dobbins’ approach. Nitrates may not be an issue but balance still is, so don’t go crazy at a cold-cut buffet.  If you like cured meats, make them leaner cuts, like ham, instead of sausage.  And have that ham with lots of veggies – even high-nitrate ones like spinach and broccoli.  A meal loaded with nitrates can, and should, still be healthy.  0000000000000

Learn From a Baby About New Year’s Resolutions

Even a baby who hasn’t seen his/her first New Year can teach us something about making resolutions.  Babies may not think about their health, but this poll done in the UK found the top 3 resolutions for adults:

  1. Lose weight
  2. Get fitter
  3. Eat more healthy

Wisely, the poll also followed up with these people.  Nearly two out of three who made resolutions keep them and more than 4 in 10 broke a resolution within the first month.  Only 1 in 3 kept going for more than a month. 

Resolutions: They’re FOR the Year, so TAKE All Year

Imagine if a baby stopped trying to walk after falling?  Every single human would be immobile.  A broken resolution isn’t a failed resolution!  I wouldn’t even call it broken – just “in progress.”  The flip side is to expect 100% perfection 100% of the time, right from the start.  Ridiculous.  You get up, look at where you tripped up, and move on. 

This study found successful “resolvers” used more behavioral strategies, which, by nature, require more time, because behaviors change slowly.  Every road has a pothole or two, so if you encounter one on your journey, you’re typical and on schedule.  Keep it moving.

Ready, S.M.A.R.T., Go!  –Anytime

Learn from these guys

Never mind January 1, whenever you’re ready, the calendar will support it.  Just see a resolution as its own project.  Give it priority and treaty it with some respect.  This is you, after all.

S.M.A.R.T. is just an acronym for the components of successful goals and objectives, whether in the workplace or your personal space.   The letters have stood for different things over the years, but here’s where they stand now:

  • Specific: keep it simple, something you KNOW you can achieve. “I’m going to eat healthier” isn’t specific.  “I’m going to eat 1 cup of fruit and a cup of vegetables at least 3 days a week” is more specific.
  • Measurable: Note how far you walked, how many vegetables you ate, or whatever your specific objective is. Forget obsessing about every detail.  Again, simple is key here.
  • Achievable: Specific and achievable are two sides of the same coin.  THINK LIKE A BABY here.  Take baby steps!  Set a goal you think is achievable and then reduce the goal by 50% or more.    You can inch up later. 
  • Realistic: Meet yourself where you live.  If you can’t spare a whole hour a day for exercise – or if you’re not in shape yet for that – it’s OK.  I don’t care if you start walking for 5 minutes a day.  You’ll be at this the whole year and you’ll get where you need to go.  An easy goal is the best kind when you’re starting out. If you want to lose 10 pounds of body fat in 3 days, that’s specific but not realistic. 
  • Time-bound: TAKE THE WHOLE YEAR but set small time goals for the baby steps.  You’re building a habit here, and habits take time to become established. 

We want everything done immediately and easily sustained forever.  Let that concept go, because it’ll never happen – for anyone.  Most importantly, THAT’S OK. 

Baby steps & persistence!

Babies Have Vitamin “P”

Back to babies.  They’re loaded with vitamin P – persistence and patience!  Even better – they LOVE the journey and what they accomplish along the way!  Have you ever seen a baby’s expression when they crawl farther, learn to hold a spoon, or stand for the first time?   Give yourself a little credit for taking those baby steps.  They’re the best kind!